Gardner Dailey,

Home Page

Proposed ProjectBackground, Adverse ImpactsAbout Us, Help, ContactsChannel Dr.ElevationsChannel Drive PicturesMain Entrance PicturesTower PicturesUpper Deck PicturesEast Elevation PicturesPool PicturesInterior PicturesArchitectural PublicationsPictures from BeachPictures from OceanDocomomo ArticleLetters I  Appeals-Montecito PCAppeals-S.Bar HLACLinks
Appeals-Coastal Commission
 

Background, Adverse ImpactsAbout Us, Help, ContactsChannel Dr.ElevationsChannel Drive PicturesMain Entrance PicturesTower PicturesUpper Deck PicturesEast Elevation PicturesPool PicturesInterior PicturesArchitectural PublicationsPictures from BeachPictures from OceanDocomomo ArticleLetters ILinksAppeals-Montecito PCAppeals-S.Bar HLACAppeals-Coastal CommissionAppeals-Coastal CommissionAppeals-Coastal Commission

 

club93108.net

 

Proposed Project

A project has been approved for the Coral Casino which will add a second story restaurant. This restaurant will destroy many of the most significant architectural elements of Gardner Dailey’s original LOW, LINEAR and OPEN International Modern design and compromise the architectural integrity of the landmarked Coral Casino. The primary justification for the project is to create a second story restaurant with a view of the Pacific Ocean. However, an alternate design was rejected which would have provided the additional space for a restaurant on the first floor. This alternate design would have preserved many of the most significant architectural elements of Gardner Dailey’s original design and did not compromise the architectural integrity of the landmarked Coral Casino.

Approvals have been granted for the proposed project by the County of Santa Barbara.   Those approvals were appealed to the California Coastal Commission (on August 10 2005, Coral Casino, Appeal No. A-4-STB-05-130 item 14.d of Agenda at http://www.coastal.ca.gov/mtgcurr.html .) The Commission voted not to hear the appeals. Both appellants were given a total of several minutes to speak.

A lawsuit has been filed, as Santa Barbara County violated CEQA in failing to adopt feasible project alternatives: the project objectives can be met without adding a second story restaurant. A December 20, 2005 hearing upheld that no demolition will take place until the case is resolved. That court date is set for March 10, 2006. Meanwhile supporters of the demolition plan, officially labeled the Selective Salvage Plan, continue to accuse preservationists of abusing the administrative process as a delay tactic. Preservationists likewise have been threatened by project supporters with lawsuits and other forms of harassment. The local press favors the project, making it difficult to educate the community about the facts.

Please view http://www.coralcasinoprivateclub.org for further details and evidence of what is truly happening to Santa Barbara. This project, that represents so many adverse impacts, mirrors a multitude of major development projects changing the face and quality of life of this community. Citizens now have to fight for compliance with zoning ordinances and laws while wealthy developers appear to buy the green light for projects which should never even be considered.

California Coastal Commission
South Central Coast District Office
89 South California Street, Suite 200
Ventura, CA 93001-2801
FAX (805) 641-1732

California Coastal Commission
Headquarters Office
45 Fremont Street
Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94105-2219
FAX (415) 904-5400

Additional contact information can be found at http://www.coastal.ca.gov/address.html

 A roster of the Commissioners is listed at http://www.coastal.ca.gov/roster.html

 


 



Search Web Site
Keywords   
                All Words  Any Words
  

Home Page | Proposed Project | Background, Adverse Impacts | About Us, Help, Contacts |  Channel Drive Elevations | Channel Drive Pictures | Main Entrance Pictures | Tower Pictures | Upper Deck Pictures | East Elevation Pictures | Pool Pictures | Interior Pictures | Pictures from Beach | Pictures from Ocean | Docomomo Article  Architectural Publications | Letters I | Appeals- Montecito P.C. Comm. |   Appeals-S.Bar HLAC 

LINKS |